Email this article Improved Converter Design Use of SHE-PWM for Harmonic Immunity in VSC HVDC Transmission
Abstract
The idea of multilevel inverters, presented around 20 years back involves performing power change in various voltage ventures to get enhanced force quality, lower exchanging misfortunes, better electromagnetic similarity, and higher voltage capacity. The advantages are particularly clear for medium-voltage drives in modern applications and are being considered for future maritime boat impetus frameworks. A few topologies for multilevel inverters have been proposed throughout the years; the most well-known fell H-connect separated from other multilevel inverters is the ability of using distinctive dc voltages on the individual H-span cells which brings about part the force change amongst higher-voltage lower recurrence and lower-voltage higher-recurrence inverters. Control strategies in view of specific consonant end beat width tweak (SHE-PWM) systems offer the most reduced conceivable number of exchanging moves. This component likewise brings about the most reduced conceivable level of converter exchanging misfortunes. Thus, they are exceptionally alluring methods for the voltage-source-converter-(VSC) based high-voltage dc (HVDC) power transmission frameworks. The paper talks about improved regulation examples which offer controlled symphonious safety between the air conditioner and dc side. The application concentrates on the routine two-level converter when its dc-join voltage contains a blend of low recurrence symphonious segments. Reenactment and trial results are introduced to affirm the legitimacy of the proposed exchanging designs. At long last a five level multilevel converter topology is connected for this application.
Keywords
References
J. McDonald, “Leader or follower [The business scene],†IEEE Powe Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 18–90, Nov. 2008.
N. Flourentzou, V. G. Agelidis, and G. D. Demetriades, “VSC-based HVDC power transmission systems: An overview,†IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 592–602, Mar. 2009.
A. A. Edris, S. Zelingher, L. Gyugyi, and L. J. Kovalsky, “Squeezing more power from the grid,†IEEE Power Eng. Rev., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 4–6, Jun. 2002.
B. K. Perkins and M. R. Iravani, “Dynamic modeling of high power static switching circuits in the dq-frame,†IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 678–684, May 1999.
P. Steimer, O. Apeldoorn, E. Carroll, and A. Nagel, “IGCT technology baseline and future opportunities,†in Proc. IEEE Transmi. Distrib. Conf. Expo., Oct. 2001, vol. 2, pp. 1182–1187.
V. G. Agelidis and G. Joos, “On applying graph theory toward a unified analysis of three-phase PWM inverter topologies,†in Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf., Seattle, WA, Jun. 1993, pp. 408–415.
J. Arrillaga, Y. H. Liu, and N. RWatson, Flexible Power Transmission: The HVDC options. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2007.
G. Asplund, “Application of HVDC light to power system enhancement,†in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter Meeting, Singapore, Jan. 2000, vol. 4, pp. 2498–2503.
P. N. Enjeti, P. D. Ziogas, and M. Ehsani, “Unbalanced PWMconverter analysis and corrective measures,†in Proc. IEEE Industry Applications Soc. Annu. Meet., San Diego, CA, Oct. 1989, pp. 861–870.
P. N. Enjeti and W. Shireen, “A new technique to reject dc-link voltage ripple for inverters operating on programmedPWM waveforms,†IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 171–180, Jan. 1992.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2013, All rights reserved.| ijseat.com
International Journal of Science Engineering and Advance Technology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.Based on a work at IJSEat , Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_GB.
Â